Sunday, December 7, 2008

8 comments:

Zr-i said...

mn lo ngaihpoimoh saka ka van lom..i pic ho chu nalh hlom hlee mai ..nalh top ani mai!! :)
i font color hi chhiar a har ee..thlak daih la (

zoram said...

u tai, I Tell-a-Friend hi hman ka tum a a theih miah loh nia...i pic ho hi thon ka tum a ...kya kua re? lolz!

illusionaire said...

Pu Hruai, fonts leh template background color a va in clash angreng ve!!! :)

DRAFT DO NOT... i ti kiau sia, permission ka lo la, misual.com latest bloggers update a link nan che.

zoram said...

eeee..ka hre toh. ihmo socialtwist ah i lut ta a tiro, chuan site type ah khan blog i choose a, ta tang khan blogpsot i choose leh lo aniang...chuvang chu aniang a dik loh.

hruaia said...

Illusionaire: server down a, page layout hi ka khawih sual nasa a, siam that hleitheih lova..sorry.

misual.com ah chuan lo link rawh khai..Research paper emaw thil ziak danga hman rih loh tur tihna mai a ni e.:)

hruaia said...

zorami..ka han try leh chhin ang. tunlai chu server chhe lutuk a...!~

Awzzman said...

va han sei rapthlak ve le..!! U Tai thu ngaihnawm tak min hlui a, ka lawm e, tun tum chu ka chhiar chhuak ve thei hram.lolz, ka la chhiar nawn leh ang.

Philo said...

Exciting propositions for a linguistic turn in critical historiography about/in Mizoram and the NE. I thought finer theoretical precision would have helped your reader. For instance, the use of 'discourse' seemed to fluctuate where you claim that, "discourse failed to generate internal colonization within the North east India," and follow it with the need to be "questioned and debated in discourse." And then, to invoke Foucault in the same breath with a Marxian analysis (Development, etc) fuddles precision in the critical project. Would theoretics such as epistemic violence(Spivak), symbolic violence(Bourdieu), help frame the discursive truth regimes in finer critical light? I hope younger academics will find much to ruminate on from your creative and critical pieces.
Best.